Purpose
The purpose of ASU's initiative is to provide a forum for students,
faculty, administrators, and community leaders to explore ways to make
the Ph.D. at ASU a more valuable asset. The first year will focus on
information gathering from Ph.D. students, faculty, administrators,
and community leaders. It will also be marked by a series of national
speakers (e.g., the Changing Landscape Series) addressing issues related
to doctoral education and preparation. The second year will focus on
the integration of perspectives and the development of strategic action
plans to implement change.
Guiding Questions
The following questions will guide the project:
- How might the Ph.D. degree be made a more valuable asset at
ASU for students, faculty, the institution, and the community?
- What educational policies, practices, and structures might
be changed to maximize doctoral preparation at ASU?
- What initiatives, innovations, or new directions should be
undertaken in doctoral preparation to construct a more valuable
Ph.D. at ASU?
Structure Year 1
The Graduate College will orchestrate two levels of activity:
- College of Liberal Arts and Sciences.
CLAS has been invited to take a guiding role in engaging their students,
faculty, administrators, and community leaders in focus groups/roundtables
to address how selected programs/departments in their college might
better construct a more valuable Ph.D. CLAS is in the process of
identifying what strategies they will use to accomplish this goal.
- The Graduate College. The Graduate College, in collaboration with its constituent groups including
Dean's Advisory Council, Ph.D. graduate student groups (e.g.,
PFF. PFP), Interdisciplinary directors, Graduate Council) will host
a series of focus groups to identify ways that the ASU Ph.D. might
be made more valuable. A Steering Committee with representatives
from each constituent group will oversee the project.
Communication Strategy
The Graduate College will develop an interactive website to update university
participants of the on-going activities of the project and solicit additional
perspectives from the university community related to constructing a
more valuable Ph.D.
|
Timeline
Year 1
|
|
October
2001
|
Develop
teams, disseminate literature, develop plans for focus groups
|
|
November/December
2001
|
Host
preliminary discussions
|
|
January/February
2002
|
Continue
discussions; meet to gather/summarize information
|
|
March/April
2002
|
Panel
discussions (reports from groups disseminated; panels developed
to discuss findings/propose strategies for change)
|
|
Timeline
Year 2
|
| Fall
semester 2002 |
Bring
panelists together to discuss scope of findings and strategies
for change; develop final report and disseminate findings to university
community |
| Spring
2002 |
Disseminate
findings to national audience |
Benefits to ASU
- an opportunity for the university community
to examine the current practices, policies, and structures and discuss
future directions of the Ph.D. at ASU.
- an opportunity for groups of faculty, students,
administrators, and community leaders to explore together the contributions
of the Ph.D. at ASU.
- an opportunity to develop future fundable
opportunities to enhance Ph.D. preparation at ASU.
Outcomes Year 1
The initial outcome will be a comprehensive overview of the findings
of the focus group sessions. This comprehensive report will form the
foundation for subsequent discussion and an action plan that may be
used by faculty, students, administrators, and community leaders to
work more effectively to enhance the value of the ASU Ph.D.